Zoho Projects
Affordable, feature-deep project management with built-in AI for the Zoho suite.
What is Zoho Projects?
Zoho Projects is cloud-based project management software for planning, tracking, and collaborating on tasks, milestones, and timelines. Part of the Zoho suite, it offers Gantt charts, time tracking, and automation at an affordable price.
Best known for: Affordable, feature-deep project management
Key features
- Task and milestone management
- Gantt charts
- Time tracking and timesheets
- Workflow automation (blueprints)
- Team collaboration and chat
- Reporting dashboards
Who Zoho Projects is best for
- Budget-conscious teams wanting Gantt, timesheets, and budgets cheaply
- Existing Zoho suite users
- Teams needing time tracking and EVM without enterprise pricing
Ideal team: Small-to-midsize teams of 5–100 wanting low-cost, full-featured PM, especially those already invested in the Zoho ecosystem.
Zoho Projects pricing
Free
$0
- Up to 5 users
- 3 projects
- Subtasks + whiteboard, 5 GB
Premium
$4/per seat / mo
- Unlimited projects
- Budget + EVM + timesheets
- Zia AI + 5,000 workflow runs/mo
Enterprise
$9/per seat / mo
- SSO/2FA
- Custom roles/fields/domain
- Portfolio dashboard + critical path
Ultimate
$14/per seat / mo
- 100 read-only users
- Unlimited dashboards
- 500,000 workflow runs/mo
Costs to watch before you commit
- Best prices need annual commitment (~$1/user/mo more on monthly billing).
- Local tax/VAT/GST is added on top of the listed USD price.
- Read-only and resource-user caps apply per tier; extra lite users are paid add-ons.
- Ultimate enforces a 150 GB org-wide storage minimum.
Zoho Projects pros and cons
Pros
- Remarkably cheap: Premium at $4 per seat is a fraction of monday.com, Asana, or Wrike at comparable capability
- Budgeting, timesheets, and earned value management are built in rather than reserved for enterprise tiers
- Free plan covers 5 users and 3 projects, enough for a small team to run real work
- Gantt charts, critical path, and portfolio dashboards without an add-on
- Zia AI and 5,000 workflow automation runs per month included from Premium
- Native time tracking that feeds billing, which agencies and professional services genuinely need
Cons
- Interface is dated and less pleasant to work in than monday.com or ClickUp, which hurts voluntary adoption
- Best pricing needs annual commitment, monthly billing adds roughly $1 per user per month
- Local tax, VAT or GST is added on top of listed USD prices
- Read-only and resource-user caps apply per tier, with extra light users charged as add-ons
- Ultimate enforces a 150 GB organization-wide storage minimum
- Reporting is capable but takes configuration; it isn't attractive by default
Zoho Projects review: a closer look
What Zoho Projects is
Zoho Projects is project management with the financial layer included: tasks, dependencies, and Gantt charts sit alongside timesheets, project budgets, and earned value management. The pricing is the headline: Premium at $4 per seat per month, Enterprise at $9, Ultimate at $14. For context, monday.com and Asana typically start around $10 to $12 for tiers that don't include time tracking or budgeting at all. If your projects have money attached to them, that combination is unusual at this price.
The financial layer is the differentiator
Most project tools in this bracket treat cost as someone else's problem. Zoho Projects tracks planned versus actual hours, project budgets against spend, and earned value metrics that tell you whether a project is genuinely on track rather than merely on schedule. For agencies billing clients, professional services firms measuring utilization, and internal teams defending headcount, that data usually requires either an expensive PM tier or a separate time-tracking subscription. Getting it at $4 per seat is the strongest single argument for the product, and it's the reason to look past the interface.
Where the interface costs you
The honest weakness is the experience. Zoho Projects works, and everything you need is present, but it feels dated next to monday.com's visual polish or ClickUp's density-with-style, and it takes more clicks to accomplish the same thing. This matters more than a feature comparison suggests, because project tools fail on adoption rather than capability: a team that finds the tool unpleasant will drift back to spreadsheets and chat, and then your budget data is worthless because nobody logged time. If adoption is your known risk, weigh that against the savings honestly.
Tiers and the fine print
Free covers 5 users and 3 projects with 5 GB, genuinely usable for a small team testing the approach. Premium at $4 unlocks unlimited projects, budgets, EVM, timesheets, Zia, and 5,000 workflow runs monthly. Enterprise at $9 adds SSO, custom roles and fields, portfolio dashboards, and critical path. Ultimate at $14 raises workflow runs to 500,000 and includes 100 read-only users, but enforces a 150 GB organization storage minimum. Two details to budget: those rates assume annual commitment, with monthly billing about $1 per user higher, and local taxes are added on top of the USD figures rather than included.
How it compares
Against monday.com, monday wins clearly on interface and adoption while Zoho Projects wins on price and on including budgeting and timesheets that monday charges extra for or omits. Against Wrike, the two overlap on depth: Wrike has stronger cross-functional features like cross-tagging and better reporting, at several times the cost per seat. Against ClickUp, ClickUp offers comparable breadth with a more modern feel at a higher price, making it the better pick when adoption matters more than budget. Against Jira, they simply serve different disciplines: Jira for software delivery, Zoho Projects for client and operational work with money attached.
Who should use Zoho Projects?
A good fit
Zoho Projects suits budget-conscious teams of roughly 5 to 100 people running projects that have costs attached: agencies billing clients, professional services firms tracking utilization, and internal teams that need to report on time and budget rather than just task status. It's an easy recommendation for existing Zoho users, and for any team that would otherwise buy a PM tool plus a separate time-tracking subscription.
Look elsewhere if…
Teams whose biggest risk is people not using the tool should pay more for monday.com or ClickUp, the interface gap is real and adoption beats features. Software teams running sprints belong in Jira or Linear. Organizations needing sophisticated cross-functional coordination and deep reporting will get more from Wrike despite the cost. And anyone who simply needs a shared task list is buying far more machinery than the job requires.
The verdict
Zoho Projects is the value pick in project management, and the reason is the financial layer: budgets, timesheets, and earned value management at $4 per seat, when competitors either omit them or reserve them for tiers costing several times more. For an agency or services firm that needs to know whether projects are actually profitable, that's a genuinely compelling package. The cost is the experience: a dated interface that takes more effort to live in, and which will lose you adoption if your team has a choice. Budget the annual commitment and local taxes, run the free plan with a real project first, and if your people stick with it, few tools deliver this much for the money.
Top Zoho Projects alternatives
Popular Project Management tools teams evaluate alongside Zoho Projects.
Lucen Track (formerly Timeneye)Microsoft 365-native time tracking with easy timers, budgets, and Power BI reporting.
GanttPROOnline Gantt chart maker for professional, timeline-driven project management.
LinearStreamlined, high-velocity issue tracking for product teams.
MeisterTaskIntuitive Kanban task and project management for teams that value simplicity.
Aha!Product management software to link strategy to detailed, AI-assisted roadmaps.