BuildStackFlow
Menu

Backblaze Alternatives (2026): 8 Additional Options for Backup and Object Storage

Backblaze covers two jobs: unlimited per-computer backup for individuals and businesses, and low-cost B2 object storage for developers and infrastructure. It is cheap, simple, and popular precisely because it does those two things well without trying to be a full sync-and-share drive.

That focus is also its limit. Backblaze is not built for real-time file sync, collaboration, or shared team drives, and B2 is object storage rather than a friendly consumer folder. People shopping for alternatives usually want either richer backup and sync in one app, a cheaper or more feature-complete object store, or a proper collaborative drive.

TL;DR

  • Backblaze is unbeatable for cheap unlimited backup and low-cost B2 object storage, but not for sync or collaboration.
  • IDrive is the closest backup rival, adding multi-device backup and sync in one plan.
  • Wasabi and Amazon S3 are the natural comparisons for B2 object storage.
  • For actual file collaboration, you want Google Drive, Dropbox, or Box instead.

Why look for a Backblaze alternative?

  • Backblaze is backup and object storage, not a sync-and-share drive for collaboration.
  • Personal Backup covers one computer per license, with no native multi-device pooling.
  • B2 is raw object storage, so it needs technical setup rather than a consumer folder.
  • No real-time file sync or team workspace features.
  • Restores of very large data sets can be slow unless you pay for physical drive shipping.

Backblaze alternatives at a glance

ToolStarting priceRatingBest for
IDrive$8.29/mo4.6People who need to protect several computers and devices at once.
Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage$7.99 per TB/month flat, with no egress or API request fees; S3-compatible.Developers and teams wanting cheap, predictable S3-compatible object storage.
Amazon S3Usage-based: roughly $0.023/GB/month for Standard storage, plus request and egress fees.Developers building on AWS who need advanced object-storage features.
Google Drive$1.99/mo4.8People who need collaborative, actively edited files rather than backup.
Dropbox$9.99/mo4.5Teams that want sync and sharing with some backup convenience.
Internxt$1.5/mo2.6Users who want private, encrypted everyday storage rather than backup.
Box$5/mo4.4Regulated enterprises needing governed, collaborative content.
pCloud$4.99/mo4.5Individuals who want a simple, subscription-free consumer drive.
IDrive logo

1. IDrive

Best overall backup alternative

4.6· Capterra$8.29/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

IDrive backs up multiple computers and devices under a single plan, something Backblaze's per-computer model does not do, and it adds file sync and disk-image backup. For households or small teams with several machines it is more flexible.

Where Backblaze still wins

IDrive uses fixed storage quotas rather than Backblaze's truly unlimited per-computer backup, so heavy single-machine users may pay more.

Best for: People who need to protect several computers and devices at once.

2. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

Best for cheap S3-compatible object storage

$7.99 per TB/month flat, with no egress or API request fees; S3-compatible.

What it does better than Backblaze

Wasabi is a direct B2 competitor: S3-compatible hot object storage at a flat $7.99/TB per month with no egress or API request fees, which can beat B2 for read-heavy or restore-heavy workloads. Pricing is predictable with no surprise bandwidth bills.

Where Backblaze still wins

Wasabi has a minimum storage duration and a per-TB minimum charge, and it does not offer Backblaze's consumer backup app.

Best for: Developers and teams wanting cheap, predictable S3-compatible object storage.

3. Amazon S3

Best for developers building on AWS

Usage-based: roughly $0.023/GB/month for Standard storage, plus request and egress fees.

What it does better than Backblaze

Amazon S3 offers the deepest object-storage feature set, with lifecycle tiers, global regions, fine-grained IAM, and unmatched AWS integration that B2 cannot match. For anything already running on AWS it is the natural home.

Where Backblaze still wins

S3's usage-based pricing with request and egress fees is more expensive and less predictable than B2 or Wasabi, and it is complex to configure.

Best for: Developers building on AWS who need advanced object-storage features.

Google Drive logo

4. Google Drive

Best for files you actively work on

4.8· Capterra$1.99/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

Google Drive is a true sync-and-share drive with real-time collaboration, sharing, and integrations, covering everything Backblaze deliberately ignores. For living documents rather than cold backups it is the right tool.

Where Backblaze still wins

Drive is not a backup product and gets expensive at large capacities compared with Backblaze's unlimited backup or cheap B2.

Best for: People who need collaborative, actively edited files rather than backup.

Dropbox logo

5. Dropbox

Best for sync and sharing

4.5· Capterra$9.99/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

Dropbox delivers fast, reliable sync, sharing, and versioning across devices with a huge integration ecosystem, plus a Backup feature for folder protection. It bridges everyday file work and light backup in one app.

Where Backblaze still wins

Dropbox is far pricier per terabyte than Backblaze and is not designed for unlimited full-system backup.

Best for: Teams that want sync and sharing with some backup convenience.

Internxt logo

6. Internxt

Best for private everyday storage

2.6· Trustpilot$1.5/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

Internxt adds open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage that Backblaze's standard products do not offer by default, working as an everyday private drive at a very low price. For users who want privacy alongside capacity it fills a gap.

Where Backblaze still wins

Internxt is not a backup or object-storage product and its reliability ratings are weak, so it lacks Backblaze's unlimited backup and cheap, proven B2 pricing.

Best for: Users who want private, encrypted everyday storage rather than backup.

Box logo

7. Box

Best for enterprise content and governance

4.4· Capterra$5/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

Box adds governance, compliance, retention, and workflow to file storage as a managed service, none of which Backblaze targets. For regulated teams that need controlled, shareable content it is a different and richer tool.

Where Backblaze still wins

Box is per-seat and cloud-only, with no unlimited backup or cheap object storage like Backblaze.

Best for: Regulated enterprises needing governed, collaborative content.

pCloud logo

8. pCloud

Best for a simple lifetime storage drive

4.5· Capterra$4.99/mo

What it does better than Backblaze

pCloud offers a friendly virtual drive and one-time lifetime plans, giving individuals a set-and-forget place for files without B2's technical setup or a recurring bill. Optional Crypto adds zero-knowledge encryption.

Where Backblaze still wins

pCloud is not a full backup product and lacks Backblaze's unlimited per-computer backup and cheap object storage for developers.

Best for: Individuals who want a simple, subscription-free consumer drive.

How to choose the right Backblaze alternative

  • Choose IDrive if you need to back up several computers and devices under one plan.
  • Choose Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage if you want cheap, predictable S3-compatible object storage with no egress fees.
  • Choose Amazon S3 if you are building on AWS and need advanced object-storage features.
  • Choose Google Drive if you need collaborative, actively edited files rather than backup.
  • Choose Dropbox if you want reliable sync and sharing with some backup convenience.
  • Choose Internxt if you want private, encrypted everyday storage rather than backup.
  • Choose Box if you need governed, compliant content for a regulated team.
  • Choose pCloud if you want a simple consumer drive or a subscription-free lifetime plan.

How we evaluated

  • Feature mapping — we compare each alternative's capabilities against the tool it's replacing, job for job.
  • Real pricing — starting prices come from each vendor's public pricing page, labeled by tier.
  • User sentiment — ratings and review counts are aggregated from third-party platforms (Capterra, G2) and shown with their source.
  • Right-sizing — we weigh which team size, budget, and technical comfort each option actually fits.
  • Independence — we don't sell a competing product, and affiliate relationships never change our picks.

More on our approach on the About page.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Backblaze Personal Backup and B2?
Personal Backup is an unlimited, set-and-forget backup app for a single computer, while B2 is raw S3-compatible object storage priced per gigabyte for developers and infrastructure. They solve different problems under one brand.
What is the best alternative to Backblaze B2?
Wasabi is the closest, offering flat S3-compatible object storage with no egress or API fees, while Amazon S3 provides the deepest feature set for teams already on AWS.
Is there a Backblaze alternative that backs up multiple computers?
Yes. IDrive backs up multiple computers and devices under a single plan, which Backblaze's per-computer Personal Backup model does not do.
Can Backblaze be used like Dropbox or Google Drive?
Not really. Backblaze is backup and object storage, not a sync-and-share drive. For collaboration and real-time editing, Google Drive, Dropbox, or Box are the right choices.
Is Backblaze cheaper than Amazon S3?
For most simple workloads, yes. B2 storage and egress are typically cheaper than S3, and Wasabi is also very cost-competitive, though S3 offers more advanced features that can justify its higher, usage-based pricing.

Still weighing your options?

Answer a few quick questions and we'll recommend the right tools for your business, budget, and team.

Independent editorial. Last updated July 27, 2026. Some links are affiliate links — disclosure.