BuildStackFlow
Menu
Automation & iPaaSAutomation & iPaaS· Updated July 2026

Make logoMake vs n8n logon8n (2026 Comparison)

Our Verdict

Visual cloud automation vs. self-hostable and code-first.

Make and n8n both offer powerful, visual multi-step automation, but Make is a polished hosted SaaS while n8n is source-available and self-hostable with real code steps. Choose Make for a slick visual builder and broad app coverage without infrastructure; choose n8n to self-host, write JavaScript/Python, and control your data and AI workflows.

Best pick
It depends on your team
Integration
Webhook / API
Setup
Varies
4.7 · 963 reviews · Difficulty: Medium

Ready to try them?

We may earn a commission if you sign up through these links — it never changes your price.

01 · BUILD

Team Fit — who should build on what

Before pricing or features, get the fit right. Here's how Make and n8n map to real team profiles.

DimensionMake logoMaken8n logon8n
Primary jobVisual cloud automationSelf-hostable, code-firstEven
Best teamSemi-technical opsDevelopers & technical teamsEven
App coverage3,000+ appsEdge400+ integrations
Code & controlLimitedFull (JS/Python)Edge
HostingSaaS onlySelf-host or cloudEdge
AI workflowsNative modulesNative LangChain nodesEven
Make logo

Who is Make best for?

Automation & iPaaS

Automation-heavy, moderately technical ops or marketing teams of 1–50 who want power and volume without engineering headcount.

  • Teams that need complex, branching multi-step workflows
  • Teams running high automation volume that want lower per-run cost than Zapier
  • Teams that prefer a visual builder but want deep control (filters, iterators, error handling)
n8n logo

Who is n8n best for?

Automation & iPaaS

Technical and developer-led teams (startup to mid-market) that want to self-host and customize automations rather than rely on a closed, per-task SaaS.

  • Teams that build custom automations and want code-level control (JavaScript/Python)
  • Teams that need self-hosting for data sovereignty, compliance, or cost control
  • Teams building AI agents and LLM-driven workflows
02 · STACK

Pricing & Features — what you actually pay for

Side-by-side plans with the fine print most comparison pages skip, plus a filterable feature matrix.

Design, build, and automate anything — visually.

Free

$0

  • 1,000 credits/mo
  • 3,000+ apps
  • Routers & filters
Popular

Core

$12/mo

  • Unlimited active scenarios
  • 10,000 credits/mo
  • Make API access

Pro

$21/mo

  • Priority execution
  • Custom variables
  • Full-text log search

Hidden costs to watch

  • Billing is per module step (credits, formerly 'operations') — complex scenarios burn credits fast and overages force an upgrade.
  • The powerful visual builder has a steeper learning curve than Zapier for beginners.
  • Advertised prices require annual billing; monthly costs ~15% more and higher credit tiers scale the price up steeply.
Get started with Make

Source-available workflow automation for technical teams.

Community

$0

  • Unlimited executions
  • Run on your own infra
  • Full core features

Starter

$24/mo

  • 2,500 executions/mo
  • Unlimited workflows & users
  • ~2,300 AI credits
Popular

Pro

$60/mo

  • 10,000 executions/mo
  • Admin roles
  • Execution search & debug

Hidden costs to watch

  • Self-hosting is free software but you pay for servers, database, scaling, security, and DevOps time.
  • Cloud plans meter by workflow executions — exceeding limits pauses workflows or forces a costly upgrade.
  • Cloud pricing is set in EUR (USD shown is approximate); SSO and advanced security require Business/Enterprise.
Get started with n8n

Feature specs

4 of 8 features differ between these tools.

FeatureMake logoMaken8n logon8n
Visual workflow builderNativeNativeNativeNative
Code steps (JS/Python)Paid Add-onPaid Add-onNativeNative
App integrations (breadth)NativeNativePaid Add-onPaid Add-on
Self-hostingNot SupportedNot SupportedNativeNative
Native AI / agentsNativeNativeNativeNative
Error handlingNativeNativeNativeNative
Webhooks & APINativeNativeNativeNative
Data control / sovereigntyNot SupportedNot SupportedNativeNative
✅ Native⚡ Paid Add-on❌ Not Supported
03 · FLOW

Automation Blueprints — make them work together

The real payoff is the stack. These are concrete Make ↔ n8n workflows worth building.

Connection: Webhook / APIDifficulty: MediumSetup: Varies

Hand off from Make to n8n

TriggerMake

Scenario Complete

Condition

Needs custom code

Actionn8n

Webhook Node

Combine Make's app coverage with n8n's custom code steps.

Hand off from n8n to Make

Triggern8n

Workflow Complete

Condition

Needs a Make-only app

ActionMake

Custom Webhook

Hand off to Make when you need an app n8n doesn't natively support.

03 · FLOW

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about choosing between and combining Make and n8n.

Make or n8n?
Make for a polished hosted visual builder with more app integrations; n8n to self-host, write code, and keep full control of data and AI workflows.
Which is more developer-friendly?
n8n — it has first-class JavaScript/Python code steps and self-hosting; Make is visual-first and hosted only.
Which has more integrations?
Make, with 3,000+ apps vs n8n's 400+, though n8n's HTTP node and code steps can connect to almost any API.

Ready to build your stack?

Start a free trial and see which fits your team. No credit card needed to explore either tool.

BuildStackFlow may earn a commission when you sign up through these links — it never changes your price.

Comparison last updated July 25, 2026. BuildStackFlow independently reviews SaaS tools.